Tweets
Search
Subscribe

Entries in co-creation (7)

Monday
Jul302007

Crowdsourcing Harry Potter?

Spoiler alert: This post gives away a key plot point of the final Harry Potter book.  So if you've haven't finished the book, do not read on.

Last week Monday (at 1:30 AM) I finished part 7 of the Harry Potter series and after sat through the young man's wizardry adventures for thousands and thousands of pages, the end of the series felt like losing a friend.

And like many others, I grasped at every sentence in the Deathly Hallow's final chapter for clues that there might be more books to come.  And I'm not alone.  Millions feel the same and even my 6 year old son already started on Book 8, which he titled "Harry Potter and the Water Dragon" .

Now the good news is that J.K. Rowling has announced that she will probably do a Harry Potter Encyclopedia, with all the backstories, and also we shouldn't exclude Harry returning to Hogwarths as a guest lecturer for Defense Against the Dark Arts.  (Thanks Marina for the tip!).  The bad news is that after having spent 17 years of her life with the little bugger, Rowling feels like she deserves a break, and while I can't blame her, this means we're in for a long wait.

My prediction is that, just like for part 7, the gap will be filled with fan created sequels and tangential stories which will pop up all over the place.  Probably closely followed by loud debates in law-offices on whether they should sue these infringers on Rowling's copyright or consider them as devout fans who should be nurtured. 

This made me wonder.  What if - in stead of doing a "long wait" Bloomsbury and J.K. Rowling turned the table and crowdsourced the future episodes of Harry and his friends.  This could be done in many ways.  Soliciting and reviewing manuscripts, setting up a "never ending wiki" in which each story has substories, doing Potter writing competitions, you name it.  But in short, "give Harry to the fans".

This way, everyone would win.  Rowling would be free of the pressure to write more, and if she ever did would have retained her blockbuster status (even in a world of one thousand potters, there is only one original).  Bloomsbury could keep generating cash on a red-hot franchise which still has a number of episodes to go.  The would-be Harry Potter authors would have something to really sharpen their word processors on.  And fans like myself would continue to get their "annual fix" of magic.

And if I would really dream for a moment, my phone would ring next week to set it all up ...

No chance I know, but just because it all happens in your head, doesn't mean it isn't real, does it?

Thursday
Aug312006

Is Your Brand 'BlogSafe'?

What would you do if someone (say a known blogger) picks up your advertising campaign because he thinks you've done a good job, puts it on YouTube and spreads your message to his audience?  Would you send him a box of chocolates or a letter from your lawyers?

While to those who live in the social media space the answer is quite obvious, this isn't always as clear-cut for those who don't (which still make up about 99% of the world's population).  Still, if you're on the receiving end of either the chocolates or the stick, it would be nice to know up front.

After all, the above case is not hypothetical. It presented itself when in 27 August 2005, the highly popular blogger Coolz0r posted a Don't Drink and Drive spot by the Irish agency LyleBalie on YouTube and referred to it in his blog.

On August 19 2006, almost exactly a year later, he was served a DMCA take-down notice for the ad and has had his account suspended by YouTube.  Needless to say that since then, he hasn't really joined the ranks of brand advocates for LyleBalie.

While the Irish agency may have had perfectly good reasons for their move (for all I know they were simply instructed by their client to do so and in-chambers fought the decision vehemently), I think this situation is worrying for bloggers.  Especially if you consider that other agencies sit on the completely opposite side of the fence.

Look at this quote by Jan Van Aken, CEO of Ogilvy Belgium:

"We sincerely believe that the old agency/advertising paradigms don't work anymore […] We thought far too long that consumers didn't have anything else to do than hear what we had to say at the moment we had planned them to.  We have to assume a more humble position.  Those brands will come out as winners whose consumers tell the better brand stories.  So all we can do is help them with that: light the fire, hope the wind is favourable and get out of the way."

As a blogger it's getting hard to judge up front who's who. Is the next brand you write about represented by a LyleBalie or an Ogilvy?  Will you get a box of chocolate or a legal notice?  Especially as blogging, YouTube and the likes are going mainstream/commercial and lawyers are entering the game, this is getting important.

That's why I think there should be something like "social media friendliness" or "fair use" doctrine (compare it to CC if you will).  A short but crisp rule book which brands and agencies can voluntarily underwrite in which they essentially say:

  • Category 1: blog all you like, good bad or indifferent we won't strike out to you.
  • Category 2: blog all you like yet we do get sensitive if you change the look of our brand, our commercials, etc.
  • Category 3: you can reblog everything we post as is, yet don't touch the res.
  • etceter.

Of course all phrased in corporate correct lingo and associated with a nice logo :-)

If you're a blogger too am I just being paranoid, or is there something to it? And if you're a brand or agency, would you come out and support such a movement?  In short, are you "blogsafe"?

Thanks to Ilya for pointing out the Coolz0r case!

PS.  For the record, I have contacted the directors of LyleBalie for comment yet have received no answer to date.

Saturday
Aug122006

Creative Commons Around the World

I came across this little gem by Jun Sato of Toshiba over at MIT's Simplicity Blog.  It gives a comparative overview of the adoption of creative commons licenses in the world.

When I look at the numbers, the thing that makes me wonder is the "reasons" for variations from market to market.  Any ideas anyone?  

   (click to open PowerPoint).

Tuesday
May092006

5 questions for Al Cabino

Un fotograma de la película donde aparecen las botasAs no agency seems to be picking up the vibe from our sneaker advocate Al Cabino's petition, we want to help him a little in fighting his cause.  Yet we also wanted to know a little more about the man behind the sneakers (aka the maker of the first chocolate sneakers known to man).  So we asked him the five biggest questions on our mind …

Why do you want Nike to launch these particular shoes?
Everyone dreams of walking in a movie star's shoes.  The McFlys are the Holy Grail of movie sneakers. The McFlys were created just for the film, never worn beyond the silver screen.  There is a sneaker legend that says that in 2015, Nike will come out with them.  But I'm not going to wait 9 years.  There are a lot of people who don't want to wait 9 years (note: at the time of writing this post the Al Cabino petition actually was well about 17500 signatures)

Did you expect the media-attention for your project?
Yes, I expected media attention but I never expected to receive hundreds and hundreds of letters from fans around the world every day, from Tokyo to Los Angeles, from Paris to New York, from Madrid to Montreal, I have become an international sneaker celebrity, it is surreal.

Have you had any feedback from Nike on the McFly project?
Right after I started the petition I was contacted by someone at Nike.  He said "Al, this is big.  You are on the Nike Inc global intranet.  Usually the only thing on there is very important stuff for the employees."  And I was on there.  A few days in, they were already talking about it.  Nike is the world's biggest sneaker company.  All good things take time, but everyone knows about my international sneaker campaign.  When I've collected a respectable number of signatures, I will hand-deliver my petition to Nike's headquarters.  I'm trying to organize a special meeting with Phil Knight.  We will talk sneakers over some good Japanese tea.

What do you expect to get out of this? Royalties? Glory? A Nike Contract?
I want a pair of the McFlys.  A lot of my friends have been saying that Nike should hire me and give me some title like 'special sneaker projects dude' but I don't  make those decisions.  It would be fun to work with an advertising agency on some future sneaker ads. My Mom thinks I'm creative, what do you think?

Are there any other shoes you want to see released?
I want to work with the Montreal Canadiens hockey club to release some special edition sneakers that would combine my love for the Montreal Canadiens and my love for sneakers, that would be the greatest honor ever… the Canadiens are celebrating their 100th anniversary in 2009.

About Al Cabino

Al Cabino is a twenty-something Capricorn born and raised in Montreal, Canada.  He loves rock music and hockey and … sneakers.  He loves them so much that he's launched himself into the profession of sneakerographer, in reference to Jacques Cousteau, the great oceanographer.  He is also working on a book on sneakers.

Monday
May082006

The Top Ten Truths of €'Real'€ Marketers

About a week ago Guy Kawasaki wrote an article on the Top Ten Lies of Marketers.  While I admit I recognised quite a few, I wanted to provide some balance by indicating truths a “real” marketer does live by.  Compare it to a marketer's Code of the Samurai.

Upon reading this over the weekend, a friend of mine did indicate that he knew very little  marketers actually fitting this bill, yet I hope your comments with respect to this post will prove him wrong (and Guy for that matter ;-) . 

So if you have a “real” marketing story or case to share, do pass it on.  Meanwhile, here are the Truths as I see them:

Marketing initiatives connect directly to the bottom line, or simply don’t exist.

Marketing is as much a numbers game as finance.  Real marketers don't improvise, yet provide their CEO with initiatives to measurably generate cash and track their results in terms of ROI.  They help sales, production, inventory management and finance to smooth cash-in and scrap every non-productive budget even before the CFO asks the awkward question.  

Integrated marketing campaigns start in the HR department.

Most integrated campaigns fail because they are planned in isolation.  That’s why real marketers start new initiatives by talking to the HR department to ensure the internal communication, performance measures, training programmes, ... are aligned to the initiatives they take.  And because they realize that only 5% of employees really “get” the strategy anyway, they take their cheque book along to ensure HR has real fire-power.

Agencies are a resource to help make money, not win awards 

Winning a Cannes Lion may look good in your office, yet real marketers want agencies that deliver the numbers and understand their client’s business.  In fact, too many awards may even create suspicion.  Still, those agencies that are willing to make the commitment can look forward to a long term business relationship.  Creative hot-shops are interchangeable.  Partners that make you money, usually tend to stick around.

Agencies need money too

The commoditization of the advertising industry and the prevailing budgetary orthodoxies prohibit many agencies to come up with the best solution, and forces them to go for the quick buck.  That’s why real marketers re-examine commission structures and budget allocations so agencies have the financial breathing space to “deliver” against measurable financial objectives.

Product management is a relic from the industrial age

In the old days you had a factory which needed to push product.  For that you employed product managers who continuously came up with more arguments why your product was the hottest things since sliced bread.  Unless you are still in this situation (which means PM makes sense), flexible production methods mean companies can organize them around consumers.  That’s why real marketers replace their product management structures with those centered around customer types.

Simplicity rules!

Advertising and feature overload is making consumers “tune out” (now even proven by neurologists).  Real marketers respect this and focus their messages on the essence of what they’re trying to say, simply deleting all the rest.  They also avoid countering marketing immunity by bigger doses of promotion, yet focus on timing their message only at the most relevant moment (ironically saving a bundle of budget in the process).

Authenticity rules!

Sorry Seth, yet all marketers aren’t liars.  In fact, real marketers understand that the brand promise they make, is to be translated and relentlessly delivered at every touchpoint.  On one side because they realize that the penalty for insincerity is brutal. On the other side, … well because they actually believe in what they say.  You cannot fake being authentic.  Real marketers don’t sell products and services they aren’t passionate about.  They’d rather quit their job.

Trust customers as much as you expect them to trust you. 

In the social media space reputations can be made or broken in the blink of an eye, and there’s nothing a brand can do about it.  Real marketers see this and proactively open up their treasure box to their community of users.  They publicly own up to mistakes and involve consumers in creating promotions and even products.  Above all, real marketers understand that love for a brand starts with trust, and to earn trust you first have give it.

There’s nothing wrong with hard work 

For some, marketing is a profession which is 90% about coming up with ideas and then farming out the “doing” to agencies.  Real marketers see this differently.  They implement rigorous processes to ensure initiatives get executed on-time, on-budget and with maximum financial impact on the business.  They go along on sales calls, not to talk about their latest campaign, yet to listen, learn and help the account manager get the business.  In short, they roll up their sleeves and work.

There’s more to life than making money 

When fighting MS Outlook it is easy to forget about the really important things in life.  Real marketers don’t.  It may take them some effort, yet they find ways to justifiable build “doing good” into their business model.  Not because of PR value (which may be their pitch), or feeling of corporate guilt (which may be their angle), yet simply because they want to use their position to make a difference.

And to end with the eleventh rule that shall remain unwritten … there are no truths.

PS. Guy, I hope you don’t mind my borrowing your signature bullet-point style.  Promise I’ll do it only once ;-)